tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29731691.post8213579089210993350..comments2023-03-26T19:40:27.134-05:00Comments on Uniquely Joe: Best picture about Fossil Fuels vs Electricitysstchttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00821202515283762603noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29731691.post-68970840380825006122008-08-02T14:51:00.000-05:002008-08-02T14:51:00.000-05:00of just the uranium?88,250,000 Energy density by m...of just the uranium?<BR/>88,250,000 Energy density by mass (MJ/kg) <BR/>1,500,000,000 Energy density by volume (MJ/L) <BR/><BR/>gasoline, on the other hand,<BR/>46.9 (MJ/kg) <BR/>34.6 (MJ/L)<BR/><BR/>Hydrogen looks good if you just look at energy density. Expand your mind to an integrated system, and its not so good. <BR/><BR/>after all of the shielding and cooling for uranium? Not so great.<BR/><BR/>After all, we would have nuclear airplanes then.<BR/><BR/>I suppose it is more then specific energy of the fuel. To be more precise, we need a graph of specific energy of an integrated system for certain applications, like car or airplane or electricity production.sstchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00821202515283762603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29731691.post-36708414276289031262008-08-01T10:37:00.000-05:002008-08-01T10:37:00.000-05:00Ah, but what is the specific energy of uranium?Ah, but what is the specific energy of uranium?SPAMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07957920210472875437noreply@blogger.com